The Skin On A Turkey's Head Changes Colour According To What Factor?

Chapter 3: Company Structure

Lead-in

Which department- production, finance, accounting, marketing, sales, human resources,

etc.- of an organization do you lot remember is the nigh interesting to work in?

For me, I would like to work in the production department since that is where the heart of the

company is. The company is what information technology produces (might be a product, service, etc). In every

company there would exist departments that are very similar, just in the product floor, you will

know the visitor'southward identity.

What reasons can you lot recollect of for why departments get into conflict with each other?

The merely reasons I run into would be the lack of communication within. Conflicts usually start when

there is no transparency, this most of the time leads to miscommunication.

Is it meliorate to have one firsthand boss or to work for more thursdayan one director?

I think information technology would be better to just be supervised past one superior. This would reduce the chance of

conflict betwixt the bosses and the chain of command would be more than elementary.

Do you adopt to work alone or in a squad?

It varies. For me, I usually work lonely since I don't want other people to bother me whenever I

am working. This also requires little to no communication at all so it's easier to concentrate and

to come up out with an output.

Is it more motivating to be responsible to someone for your work, or responsible for

people who study to you?

I think it would motivate me more to be responsible for people who study to me for it won't exist

boring and at the same time you encounter new faces everyday. There would be a lot of things to

tackle and at that place would be dissimilar things to consider so it won't be just plain boring.

Reading: Wikonomics and the time to come of companies

How is the world of organized piece of work changing?

Based on the text below, it states that some works inside the visitor are already being

outsourced and the collaboration with people outside would exist more axiomatic. The visitor no

longer operates on its own merely would rather outsource ideas for the betterment of their own.

A great case of this change are the two companies Red Lake and Procter & Gamble. They

have used their money for research wisely past utilizing all available resources out at that place.

In what ways could your organization, company or business school use the wikinomics

principle?

For our school, I see that outsourcing professors from different other universities would be a

slap-up addition to the set of faculty the school already has. The more inputs the school provides

the students (varieties of teacher) the better didactics they would have.

What do you retrieve are the disadvantages of the wikonomics principle?

The threat I see for this kind of principle is that when the visitor uses too much of the outside

availability of resources rather than just rely on their ain, they might lose the loyalty of their

own employees and they might also lose their focus on their identity in the long run due to

unlike inputs captivated by the company.

Source: https://www.studocu.com/row/document/north-chiang-mai-university/business-english/chapter-3-4-individual-homework/11845671

Posted by: tobinmors1941.blogspot.com

Share this post